<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RSoccer.com Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rsoccer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rsoccer.com</link>
	<description>Blog about soccer</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Uruguay win RSoccer.com User Voting 2008 by stevan</title>
		<link>http://blog.rsoccer.com/2008/12/30/uruguay-win-rsoccercom-user-voting-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>stevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rsoccer.com/?p=220#comment-75</guid>
		<description>In the “WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2009-12-30″ (not the User Voting but the official rsoccer ranking) there is a NEW YEAR BUG again:

On WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2009-12-29
all was ok:
England had 11 matches, 7wins, 1 draw and 3 losses, Goaldifference 28:9
since new year it is wrong:
WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2009-12-30
England has only 10 matches, 8 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, Goaldifference 25:8;
but this is exactly the 2008 and not the 2009 score!!
And its the same for all countries, I believe!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the “WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2009-12-30″ (not the User Voting but the official rsoccer ranking) there is a NEW YEAR BUG again:</p>
<p>On WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2009-12-29<br />
all was ok:<br />
England had 11 matches, 7wins, 1 draw and 3 losses, Goaldifference 28:9<br />
since new year it is wrong:<br />
WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2009-12-30<br />
England has only 10 matches, 8 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, Goaldifference 25:8;<br />
but this is exactly the 2008 and not the 2009 score!!<br />
And its the same for all countries, I believe!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uruguay win RSoccer.com User Voting 2008 by rsoccer</title>
		<link>http://blog.rsoccer.com/2008/12/30/uruguay-win-rsoccercom-user-voting-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>rsoccer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rsoccer.com/?p=220#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Thanks for hint. Problem was fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for hint. Problem was fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uruguay win RSoccer.com User Voting 2008 by stevan</title>
		<link>http://blog.rsoccer.com/2008/12/30/uruguay-win-rsoccercom-user-voting-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>stevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rsoccer.com/?p=220#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Guam had a victory at last! Against Mongolia on 2009-03-11 (as mentioned in your Last Results 2009). But in the ranking (http://www.rsoccer.com/fullranking.html) Guam is still WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2009-03-16 counted with 0 wins.

Mongolia even has 0 games alltogether, even though they won against Macau and lost against Guam.

Would you please check these two countries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guam had a victory at last! Against Mongolia on 2009-03-11 (as mentioned in your Last Results 2009). But in the ranking (http://www.rsoccer.com/fullranking.html) Guam is still WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2009-03-16 counted with 0 wins.</p>
<p>Mongolia even has 0 games alltogether, even though they won against Macau and lost against Guam.</p>
<p>Would you please check these two countries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uruguay win RSoccer.com User Voting 2008 by rsoccer</title>
		<link>http://blog.rsoccer.com/2008/12/30/uruguay-win-rsoccercom-user-voting-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>rsoccer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rsoccer.com/?p=220#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Now works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uruguay win RSoccer.com User Voting 2008 by stevan</title>
		<link>http://blog.rsoccer.com/2008/12/30/uruguay-win-rsoccercom-user-voting-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>stevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rsoccer.com/?p=220#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Great!
But at least with me I still have another bug:
When I klick on http://www.rsoccer.com/allresults.html I only see results including 2008-12-30  United Arab Emirates (86)  Kuwait (64) 0:0 Friendly Dubai 
Although I can see by the updated rankings that even the most recent results of January 7th 2009 must already be included.

Why can't I see the results of 2009?
Is it because of my server - or because of your server?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great!<br />
But at least with me I still have another bug:<br />
When I klick on <a href="http://www.rsoccer.com/allresults.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rsoccer.com/allresults.html</a> I only see results including 2008-12-30  United Arab Emirates (86)  Kuwait (64) 0:0 Friendly Dubai<br />
Although I can see by the updated rankings that even the most recent results of January 7th 2009 must already be included.</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t I see the results of 2009?<br />
Is it because of my server - or because of your server?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uruguay win RSoccer.com User Voting 2008 by rsoccer</title>
		<link>http://blog.rsoccer.com/2008/12/30/uruguay-win-rsoccercom-user-voting-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>rsoccer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 09:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rsoccer.com/?p=220#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stevan, it was NEW YEAR BUG. Now is all corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stevan, it was NEW YEAR BUG. Now is all corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uruguay win RSoccer.com User Voting 2008 by stevan</title>
		<link>http://blog.rsoccer.com/2008/12/30/uruguay-win-rsoccercom-user-voting-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>stevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rsoccer.com/?p=220#comment-13</guid>
		<description>In the "WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2008-12-30" (not the User Voting but the official rsoccer ranking) there is a mistake about Norway:

Norway actually had 4 draws and was defeated 4 times and won no soccer match the last 12 months.
In the "WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2008-12-17" Norway was correctly ranked 64th with 0 Wins, 4 Draws and 4 Losses.
But in the "WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2008-12-30" Norway is all of a sudden ranked 9th with 6 Wins, 2 Draws, 3 Losses. This is absolutely incorrect!!
Most probably this is the ranking for 2007, because in the year 2007 Norway actually achieved 6 wins. So the years must have been confused in your program. Please check this and release the correct official rsoccer ranking for 2008-12-30.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the &#8220;WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2008-12-30&#8243; (not the User Voting but the official rsoccer ranking) there is a mistake about Norway:</p>
<p>Norway actually had 4 draws and was defeated 4 times and won no soccer match the last 12 months.<br />
In the &#8220;WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2008-12-17&#8243; Norway was correctly ranked 64th with 0 Wins, 4 Draws and 4 Losses.<br />
But in the &#8220;WORLD RSOCCER.COM ranking as of 2008-12-30&#8243; Norway is all of a sudden ranked 9th with 6 Wins, 2 Draws, 3 Losses. This is absolutely incorrect!!<br />
Most probably this is the ranking for 2007, because in the year 2007 Norway actually achieved 6 wins. So the years must have been confused in your program. Please check this and release the correct official rsoccer ranking for 2008-12-30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UEFA Cup Qualification Second Round 1 Leg by Fretzli</title>
		<link>http://blog.rsoccer.com/2008/08/14/uefa-cup-qualification-second-round-1-leg/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Fretzli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rsoccer.com/?p=109#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hello
I'm writing an important work for school. There I analyse rankings of football nations. The FIFA-World-Ranking is a central point. I'm also interessed to know how you calculate your international football ranking. I saw the ranking rules, but I'm intressed in more details.
I'm very thankful for answering. You can also write an E-Mail to kaschtenr1@gmx.net
Thank you very much
Greetings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello<br />
I&#8217;m writing an important work for school. There I analyse rankings of football nations. The FIFA-World-Ranking is a central point. I&#8217;m also interessed to know how you calculate your international football ranking. I saw the ranking rules, but I&#8217;m intressed in more details.<br />
I&#8217;m very thankful for answering. You can also write an E-Mail to <a href="mailto:kaschtenr1@gmx.net">kaschtenr1@gmx.net</a><br />
Thank you very much<br />
Greetings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
